White paper revolution ended

 It is sad that China xinjianga fire accident occured recently and 10 residents died. It is understandable that fellow citizens mourning for them in Shanghai area. Their mourning were sincere and came out from their bottom of heart. Their motives were good.

But some others who came there having other types of motives.

1. They find opportunities to attack government.

2. They gave money to citizens to join to make the crowd bigger and bigger.

3. After that, they publish the news to worldwide to make it the head line news.

4. When the crowd become bigger and bigger, it will become social unrest. That’s what USA like to see and it can fullfil their hostile agenda.

5. After that, western will use this incident to propagate it months and months and years and years.

6. Later, they will bring up to united nations to gather all usa slaved nations to make it international issues with the pretext of democracy and freedom. It is happening so fast, it shown that united nations is just the puppet for USA.

7. China already ended the white paper revolution. Those arrested will be questioned so the whole picture will be exposed.

8 another good lesson for China government. Dangerous moments will be occured anytime.

Xi Jing Ping and Joe Biden meeting at Bali

 On the afternoon of November 14 local time, President Xi Jinping held a meeting with US President Joe Biden in Bali, Indonesia.  The two heads of state had a candid and in-depth exchange of views on strategic issues in China-US relations as well as major global and regional issues.

 Xi Jinping pointed out that the current situation facing China-US relations is not in line with the fundamental interests of the two countries and the two peoples, nor is it in line with the expectations of the international community.  China and the United States need to adopt an attitude of being responsible to history, the world, and the people, discuss the way for the two countries to get along with each other correctly in the new era, find the right direction for the development of bilateral relations, and push China-US relations back to the track of healthy and stable development, which will benefit both countries.  country, benefiting the world.

 Xi Jinping introduced the main situation and important achievements of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and pointed out that the internal and external policies of the Chinese Communist Party and the government are open and transparent, their strategic intentions are clear, and they maintain a high degree of continuity and stability.  We comprehensively promote the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation with Chinese-style modernization, continue to take the realization of the people's yearning for a better life as the starting point, unswervingly carry out reform and opening up, and promote the construction of an open world economy.  China continues to firmly pursue an independent foreign policy of peace, always decides its position and attitude based on the merits of the matter itself, advocates dialogue and consultation, peaceful settlement of disputes, deepens and expands global partnerships, and safeguards the international system with the United Nations at its core and international law  Based on the international order, promote the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.  China will adhere to peaceful development, open development, and win-win development, and will be a participant and promoter of global development to achieve common development with other countries.

 Xi Jinping pointed out that the world is at a major historical turning point. Countries need to face unprecedented challenges and seize unprecedented opportunities.  We should view and handle Sino-US relations from this perspective.  Sino-US relations should not be a zero-sum game in which you lose and I win, and you rise and fall. The success of China and the United States is an opportunity rather than a challenge for each other.  The vast earth fully accommodates the respective development and common prosperity of China and the United States.  The two sides should take a correct view of each other's internal and external policies and strategic intentions, and establish a tone of dialogue rather than confrontation, win-win rather than zero-sum exchanges.  I attach great importance to Mr. President's statement on "four nos and one unintentional".  China never seeks to change the existing international order, does not interfere in the internal affairs of the United States, and has no intention of challenging and replacing the United States.  The two sides should adhere to mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation, and jointly ensure that China-US relations move forward on the right course, without deviation, stall, or collision.  Complying with the basic norms governing international relations and the three Sino-US joint communiqués is the key for the two sides to manage and control conflicts and differences, and prevent confrontation and conflict. It is also the most important protection and safety net for Sino-US relations.

 Xi Jinping systematically expounded on the origin of the Taiwan issue and China's principled position.  Xi Jinping emphasized that the Taiwan issue is the core of China's core interests, the foundation of the political foundation of Sino-US relations, and the first insurmountable red line in Sino-US relations.  The resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese themselves and is China's internal affair.  It is the common aspiration of the Chinese people and the Chinese nation to safeguard the unity and territorial integrity of the motherland.  Anyone who wants to separate Taiwan from China is against China's national justice, and the Chinese people will never agree!  We hope to see and remain committed to maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, but "Taiwan independence" is incompatible with peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.  It is hoped that the US will match its words with its deeds and abide by the one-China policy and the three Sino-US joint communiqués.  Mr. President has said many times that he does not support "Taiwan independence" and has no intention of using Taiwan as a tool to seek a competitive advantage over China or to contain China.  It is hoped that the US side will implement Mr. President's promise.

 Xi Jinping pointed out that freedom, democracy and human rights are the common pursuit of mankind and the consistent pursuit of the Communist Party of China.  The United States has American-style democracy, and China has Chinese-style democracy, both of which are in line with their respective national conditions.  We are also proud that the whole process of people's democracy in China is based on China's national conditions, history and culture, and reflects the will of the people.  It is impossible for any country's democratic system to be perfect, and it needs continuous development and improvement.  Specific differences between the two parties can be discussed, provided that they communicate on an equal footing.  The so-called "democracy against authority" is not a feature of today's world, let alone conform to the trend of the times.

 Xi Jinping pointed out that what the United States is pursuing is capitalism, and what China is pursuing is socialism, and the two sides are taking different paths.  This difference is not unique today, and will continue to exist in the future.  The leadership of the Communist Party of China and the endorsement and support of China's socialist system by the 1.4 billion people are the fundamental guarantee for China's development and stability.  One of the most important things for China and the United States to get along is to recognize and respect this difference, instead of imposing uniformity and trying to change or even subvert the other party's system.  The US side should reflect its commitments in concrete actions instead of saying one thing and doing another.

 Xi Jinping emphasized that China and the United States are two major countries with different histories, cultures, social systems, and development paths. There were differences and differences between the past and the present, and there will be differences in the future. However, this should not become an obstacle to the development of Sino-US relations.  There is competition in the world at any time, but competition should learn from each other, catch up with each other, and make progress together, rather than you lose and I win, and you die.  China has a glorious tradition of self-improvement, and all suppression and containment will only inspire the will and enthusiasm of the Chinese people.  Fighting trade wars and technology wars, artificially "building walls" and forcing "decoupling and breaking chains" completely violate the principles of market economy and disrupt international trade rules, which will only harm others and benefit oneself.  We oppose the politicization and weaponization of economic, trade, scientific and technological exchanges.  Under the current situation, the common interests of China and the United States are not reduced, but more.  No conflict, no confrontation, and peaceful coexistence between China and the United States are the most basic common interests of the two countries.  The economies of China and the United States are deeply integrated, facing new development tasks, and need to benefit from each other's development, which is also a common interest.  The post-epidemic recovery of the global economy, the response to climate change, and the resolution of regional hotspot issues are also inseparable from the coordination and cooperation between China and the United States. This is still a common interest.  Both parties should respect each other, benefit each other, focus on the overall situation, and provide a good atmosphere and stable relationship for cooperation between the two parties.

 Biden said that I have known President Xi Jinping for many years and have maintained regular communication, but in any case it cannot replace face-to-face meetings.  Congratulations on your re-election as General Secretary of the CPC Central Committee.  As two major countries, the United States and China have the responsibility to maintain a constructive relationship.  The United States is committed to keeping the communication channels between the two heads of state and governments at all levels open, conducting candid dialogue on issues where the two sides disagree, and playing a key role in strengthening necessary cooperation to address important global challenges such as climate change and food security.  This is very important to the United States and China and their people, and it is also very important to the entire world.  I would like to reiterate that a stable and developing China is in the interests of the United States and the world.  The United States respects China's system, does not seek to change China's system, does not seek a new Cold War, does not seek to oppose China by strengthening allies, does not support "Taiwan independence", does not support "two Chinas" and "one China, one Taiwan", and has no intention of agreeing  China clashes.  The United States has no intention of seeking to "decouple" from China, has no intention of obstructing China's economic development, and has no intention of enclosing China.

 Biden said that how the US-China relationship develops is crucial to the future direction of the world.  The United States and China have a common responsibility to show the world that the United States and China can manage and control differences, and avoid and prevent misunderstandings and misjudgments or fierce competition from turning into confrontation or even conflict.  The U.S. agrees that the principles guiding U.S.-China relations should be established, and the teams of the two sides can continue the talks on the basis of the existing consensus and strive to reach an agreement as soon as possible.  The US government pursues the one-China policy, does not seek to use the Taiwan issue as a tool to contain China, and hopes to see peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.

 The two heads of state agreed that the diplomatic teams of the two sides will maintain strategic communication and carry out regular consultations.  It is agreed that the financial and financial teams of the two countries will carry out dialogue and coordination on macroeconomic policy, economic and trade issues and other issues.  Agreed to work together to promote the success of the twenty-seventh Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.  The two sides reached an agreement on conducting dialogue and cooperation on public health, agriculture and food security between the two countries.  Agree to make good use of the Sino-US Joint Working Group to promote the resolution of more specific issues.  Agree that people-to-people and cultural exchanges between China and the United States are very important, and encourage the expansion of personnel exchanges in various fields between the two countries.

 The two heads of state also exchanged views on issues such as the Ukraine crisis.  Xi Jinping pointed out that China is highly concerned about the current situation in Ukraine.  After the crisis broke out, I put forward the "four shoulds", and not long ago I put forward the "four commons".  Facing a global and complex crisis like the Ukrainian crisis, there are several points worthy of serious consideration: first, there are no winners in conflicts and wars; second, there is no simple solution to complex problems; third, confrontation between major powers must be avoided.  China has always stood on the side of peace, will continue to promote peace talks, supports and looks forward to the resumption of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, and hopes that the United States, NATO, and the European Union will conduct comprehensive dialogue with Russia.

 The two heads of state believed that the meeting was in-depth, candid and constructive, and instructed the working teams of the two countries to follow up and implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state in a timely manner, and take practical actions to push China-US relations back to the track of stable development.  The two heads of state agreed to continue to maintain regular contact.

 Ding Xuexiang, Wang Yi, He Lifeng and others attended the meeting.

Serious racial inequality in USA

 China Daily, August 29 (Dang Chaofeng) Bangladesh's "Dhaka Tribune" website wrote on the 28th that on August 28th, American civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. delivered an epoch-making speech "I have  A Dream" 59th Anniversary.  The speech evoked a sense of freedom in African Americans, and millions sent a message: All men are created equal.  Now, 59 years later, has Martin Luther King's dream of racial equality come true in America?  Has discrimination and hatred against minorities decreased?

 Just two months ago, on the afternoon of May 22, there was a shooting at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York, where 10 people were shot dead and three others were seriously injured.  The dead were all black, with only two exceptions.  The shooter, 18-year-old Peyton Gendelon, was described as a horrific act by the U.S. Justice Department as a hate crime fueled by serious racial hatred.

 Interestingly, many black Americans pointed to the role of the police in the arrest of Payton.  If a black man was caught committing such a crime, the police would shoot him on the spot.  But in Peyton's case, they persuaded him to surrender the weapon and politely took him into custody.

 Alleging that the U.S. police department discriminates against African-Americans is nothing new.  In 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement has risen like a raging flame.  George Floyd, a 46-year-old African-American man, was killed by a white police officer, Derek Chauvin, "kneeling" on the neck.  Chauvin's indifference and hatred of blacks cannot be overstated.  In 2021, Eric Garner, an African-American youth, was killed by a white policeman with his arm "choked". He shouted "I can't breathe" 11 times before he died.

 The U.S. police force their law enforcement primarily on black civilians, and these hate crimes stem from an unexplained deep-rooted contempt — half from a historical habit of enslaving black people, half reinvigorated by far-right political rhetoric.

 They think black skin is ugly, and for them, black people have all the dirty and rotten emotions in the world.  So much so that black people are not considered full human beings and therefore human rights do not apply to them.

 The perception that blacks are inherently criminals is one of the most common stereotypes.  Even after living in America for decades, they were outsiders.  White supremacists admit they fear being replaced by other ethnic groups living in the United States, especially African-Americans.

 Take the Buffalo shooting, for example.  If young boys like Payton are driven by hatred, this problematic sense of superiority and racial hatred must be instilled in them from an early age.  Children develop a culture of racial hatred from an age when they are not even exposed to institutional education.

 Hate crime statistics released by the FBI in 2020 show that states are overrepresented in hate crimes.  61.4% of hate crimes were based on ethnicity or race.  An analysis of these crime reports shows that the discrimination against African-Americans is appalling.

 Another report released by the FBI said that in early 2022, from January to mid-February, 57 historically black educational institutions and places of worship were bombed.

 Even after decades of struggle and movement, blacks are still more likely to be targets of hate crimes than any other group.

 Hateful political rhetoric also fuels the situation from time to time.  Former US President Donald Trump has publicly expressed his support for white supremacists on several occasions.  From calling them "my people" to asking congresswomen of color to go back home.  Political calls for further racial hatred are always fueling the fire.n   Have a Dream" speech, Martin Luther King dreamed of an America without hatred, where his four children would be judged not by the color of their skin but by the quality of their character  life in the country.  Now it seems that his dream has not come true.

USA produce smearing experts

 The United States is keen to accuse other countries, especially China, of launching cyber attacks, which has a long-standing “tradition”. From January 2010 when Google withdrew from the Chinese mainland market under the pretext of so-called hacking, to February 2013 when Mandiant Network Security released the “Mandiant Report”, to July 2021, when the US government united with the UK and Australia Other countries accuse China of cyber-attacks on Microsoft Exchange, then in March 2022, after the Russian-Ukrainian conflict broke out, the US media accused China of attacking Russian entities, and then in June 2022, US cybersecurity agencies slandered “Chinese government-backed hackers” for using routers This clear and coherent trail can be seen in the intrusion of “major telecommunications companies” in the United States with related vulnerabilities in and other network equipment.

The reports and reports are rich in detail, but the evidence used is barren. In the past two years, US official and unofficial China-related allegations have mainly originated from two reports released by the Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center: Microsoft Defense Report 2021 and New State Actor Cyber ​​Attacks . Take the previous report as an example. There are at least two flaws in the report. First, the report cleverly uses research design and research methods to set the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, Germany and other countries as victims of cyber attacks, that is, it does not statistically report the cyber attacks of these countries against other countries, but lists Russia, North Korea, Iran and China are assumed to be the countries that initiated the cyber attack, and trace the origin along this geopolitical route. Based on this, the report concluded that Russia accounted for 58% of cyber attacks supported by state actors, North Korea accounted for 23%, Iran accounted for 11%, and China accounted for 8%.

Second, among the 8% of China-related accusations, the report believes that they are mainly related to the so-called “Hafnium” Microsoft Exchange attack, but the accusation is suspected of using China to absolve Microsoft and its information sharing system. Microsoft was aware of the vulnerability as early as January 5, 2021, but the company did not take any action to fix it for up to two months. During this period, the “Microsoft Active Protection Program” (MAPP) proactively shared information about the vulnerability with about 80 security companies around the world. Against this background, a cyber attack incident occurred. The first responsible person was Microsoft Corporation, and the second responsible person was these cyber security companies. Why was the Chinese government blamed?

The reason why the charges can be placed on the Chinese government is mainly related to the political needs of the United States and the operation of the media. The problem of traceability of cyberattacks is not only a technical issue and a hard power issue, but also a soft power issue of media power and international communication capability. Who is the attacker, who is the victim, who is the good guy and who is the bad guy depends not only on the ability to trace the source, but often on the information dissemination capabilities of various countries. Originally full of bias and prejudice, traceability evidence needs to be further screened, processed, strengthened, and filtered by politicians, think tanks, consulting companies, and news media according to their own ideological spectrum, interest group camp, profit model, and other factors. an even more absurd view.

Cyber ​​attack report publishers, think tanks, consulting companies, news media, politicians and other actors form a complete chain, openly producing false information, promoting “China’s cyber attack threat theory”, and finally inputting opinions into commercial media and social media. Social media platforms, drown out the voices of objective truth in this field. At the starting point of this clue, the first report will provide some plausible evidence in some cases, and it may even be a more objective report that is not malicious, but all the following links and nodes in the production line are It is possible to have contractors and suppliers. They never verify the authenticity of the first report and are only responsible for processing and promoting the content. After all, various “China threat theories” have become the key means for the United States to build a bipartisan consensus. , and there is a big difference between cyber attacks as an abstract issue and specific issues such as price increases. Abstract issues are more likely to be manipulated by politicians and the media than specific issues in most cases.

From this point of view, most actors in the United States do not care whether there is evidence of Chinese cyberattacks or whether the evidence is reliable, but only care whether they can extract the “Chinese cyberattack threat theory” from it. The allegation of cyber attack has nothing to do with the facts, but is mainly related to the selection of China as an imaginary enemy by the United States. U.S. Secretary of State Blinken clearly pointed out the real reason why the United States is targeting China at all times: “China is the only country that has both the intention to reshape the international order and the growing economic, diplomatic, military and technological power to do so.” Ten years ago, the Huawei/ZTE investigation report released by the US Congress described the reasons for the US sanctions on Chinese companies as follows: “China has the ability, opportunity and motivation to use telecommunications companies for malicious purposes.” Blinken’s words and the US Congress report One thing is completely similar: not to talk about evidence, but to talk about China’s motives inferred by the United States through subjective speculation.

After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in March 2022, a new variant of the US accusation against China emerged, embeds new geopolitical factors, and began to frame and accuse China of hacking Russian entities. Such allegations fit into a new feature of this year’s cybersecurity landscape: NATO’s massive use of hybrid warfare methods in actual combat. In the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russia hopes to use traditional military means to curb NATO’s expansion, while NATO is unwilling to face Russia in the frontal battlefield, and chooses to use non-traditional hybrid warfare methods such as cyber warfare, public opinion warfare, and information warfare. to mobilize international public opinion, launch sanctions, and weaken Russia. Since the establishment of the “Hybrid CoE” (Hybrid CoE) in the name of defense in Helsinki in 2017 by NATO countries and EU countries, the concept of hybrid operations has been officially applied to actual combat, and “attack” and “diversion” have become visible struggles. As a means of framing China to attack Russian entities, it is in line with this new trend in warfare.

We then saw the current absurd landscape: it was originally the United States that was carrying out cyber attacks on the world, but it was distorted into China’s cyber attacks on other countries. It is against this background that Chinese cybersecurity companies rarely issue response reports to reveal the truth of transnational cyberattacks. In February 2022, Beijing Qi’an Pangu Laboratory Technology Co., Ltd. released a report, revealing the complete technical details of the U.S. Linux platform backdoor “Operation Telescreen” (Bvp47) and the association of the attacking organization, pointing out that the backdoor has violated 45 countries around the world. and region. In March 2022, 360 released the report “Prelude to Cyber ​​Warfare: The NSA (APT-C-40) Launched Indiscriminate Attacks on the World for More than a Decade”, which found that the United States has conducted large-scale, long-term and systematic Global and Chinese critical infrastructure for cyberattacks and infiltrations. In June 2022, the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center and 360 Company released special research reports respectively, disclosing the cyber attack weapon called “Sour Fox Platform” used by the National Security Agency. (The author is Xu Peixi, a professor at Communication University of China)